Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy ; 16: 2339-2356, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37965117

RESUMEN

Introduction: The number of caesarean section (CS) continues to rise worldwide. CS can improve outcomes in infants and mothers. However, if used improperly, the potential harm can outweigh the potential benefits. Aim: The study was to determine the factors associated with high cesarean section rates at Mengo Hospital. Methods: This cross-sectional study used a mixed-method approach that included a retrospective review of 1276 casebooks using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (RTGCS) for births that occurred at Mengo Hospital in December 2018, January, and February 2019. Questionnaire was used for data collection from 200 mothers on second day after birth from 24th May to 19th July 2019. Eight key informants were interviewed within the same period. Quantitative data were analyzed using STATA V.14, thematic analysis for qualitative data. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the association between predisposing factors and outcome variables using chi-square and modified Poisson. Results: Caesarean section rate (CSR) from casebooks was 49% and 64% from the primary data. Group 5(Previous CS, single cephalic, >37 weeks) had (35.4%) to the total number of cesarean deliveries, followed by Group 1 (Nulliparous, single cesarean deliveries, >37 weeks in spontaneous labour), with 18.4%. Group 3 (ultiparous (excluding previous CS), single cephalic, >37 weeks of spontaneous labor) with (13.7%). The common indications from casebooks were a previous scar (32%), obstructed labor (18%), and previous scar (97.6%). Presence of an obstetric indication, influence of husband, friends, relatives, and mother's desire for a CS were closely associated with caesarean delivery. Mothers said that occurrence of CS was due to health workers reducing the stress of monitoring labour and financial benefits from CS deliveries by the hospital. Conclusion: Repeat CS made the highest CSR contribution; therefore, strategies to reduce the frequency of the procedure should include avoiding medically unnecessary primary CS and encouraging vaginal birth after previous CS where applicable.

2.
Adv Med Educ Pract ; 14: 313-322, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37020902

RESUMEN

Background: Despite the recommendations for delirium assessment in clinical settings, it stills remain a serious clinical problem associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, stress on the patient and family, and mortality. There is paucity of data regarding delirium assessment and prevention in developing world. The Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) was developed to aid in the assessment of delirium. There is no documented assessment of delirium and prevention in Uganda. This study evaluated the effect of an educational intervention on nurses' knowledge and practices of delirium assessment using the CAM-ICU tool. Methods: We used a quasi-experimental and recruited a convenience sample of 29 nurses from ICU and ER. The assessment before and after the interventions was conducted using a self-completed questionnaire from October 2020 to January 2021. The interventions were delivered through face-to-face presentations, demonstrations, watching videos, and hands on practice. Data were entered into excel, cleaned and exported to Stata version 14. Median and interquartile ranges were used for continuous variables, and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. The mean knowledge score was calculated before and after the intervention. A paired t-test was used to compare Pre- and Post-test knowledge and practice scores at P <0.05. Results: Majority (62%) were female, 48% were Diploma holders, median age was 30 (IQR = 28-32) years and median years of experience 3.5 (IQR = 3-4). The Mean knowledge scores was 10.7 (SD = 2.36) pretest and 19 (0.94) posttest. The mean practice score was 2 (SD = 0.83) pretest and 6 (0.35) posttest. There were significant differences in mean knowledge and practice scores before and after intervention mean of (t (28) =17.32, p < 0.001) and (t (28) = 25.04, p<0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Educational intervention Improved nurses' knowledge and practice of delirium assessment. Continuous nursing education could improve nurses' knowledge of delirium assessment and thus quality of patient care.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...